“Higher for longer – no longer, the easing cycle begins”
Last week, the Fed made a decisive move by cutting interest rates by 50bps, signaling the start of its policy easing normalisation. This decision was largely anticipated by markets to support economic resilience, and today we will examine the implications of this rate cut cycle, how it differs from previous ones, and strategies to navigate it going forward.
Unlike previous rate cut cycles—such as those during the GFC or the COVID-19 pandemic—the US economy today is better positioned for what many expect to be a “soft landing.” We are currently in a mid-to-late-stage economic cycle, where risks of an imminent recession remain muted. Despite global uncertainties, consensus forecasts for US GDP growth have been stable, reflecting optimism in the market. The FOMC also expressed confidence in the strength of the US economy, indicating that while some challenges remain, the outlook for growth and employment is stable.
The Fed’s decision, however, to implement a more aggressive 50bps rate cut, as opposed to 25bps, highlights concerns surrounding downside risks in the labor market. Although the overall economic outlook remains positive, there are signs of softening in employment. Consensus forecasts suggest that US non-farm payroll growth will remain flat over the coming quarters. Policymakers have reiterated that they are not behind the curve but acknowledged that had they seen the July employment data sooner, rate cuts might have been initiated earlier. This proactive approach signals that while the Fed acknowledges risks, it is striving to balance those against broader economic health.
Looking ahead, we anticipate this rate cut cycle will be gradual, with another 200bps of cuts expected in 25bps intervals extending through the end of 2026. The terminal rate is forecasted to stabilise at around 3%, provided the economy continues its current trajectory. However, any signs of material weakening in economic indicators could prompt more aggressive cuts.The Fed will remain highly data-dependent in its decisions, with inflation and labor market trends playing key roles in shaping future policy moves.
One useful tool in understanding the Fed’s decisions is the Taylor Rule, a model that estimates the appropriate level for the Fed funds rate based on inflation and labor data. In August, the Taylor Rule estimated the appropriate rate to be 5%. With the recent cut, the Fed has lowered the target rate to 5%.However, if inflation were to decline to 2% and the natural unemployment rate hovered around 4.4%, the estimated rate would be closer to 4.05%, still above the market’s forecasted terminal rate of 3%. This suggests a tilt towards a more pessimistic scenario, where downside risks to growth,or a hard landing, could lead to further easing.
In conclusion, navigating this rate cut cycle will require careful monitoring of economic data and Fed actions. The pace and magnitude of rate cuts will have an impact on the pricing of risk-on assets. Additionally, as we approach the USelections in November, political uncertainty could exacerbate market volatility. A balanced approach, with an eye on cyclical sectors and risk management, will be crucial as we move into Q4 2024.
US yields drifted higher post the September FOMC. Markets are unlikely to price a faster pace of cuts or a lower terminal rate until the September employment data in about 2 weeks’ time. A decisive factor will be the path of the unemployment rate, where 12 of 19 FOMC participants see the risks to even their new higher forecasts as tilted to the upside. This suggests a risk of more dovish Fed action, such as cutting another 50 bp in November, in the event of further labour market cooling and/or downward revisions to historical data. Expect that any rise in yields over the next several weeks will likely be limited, particularly at the front end. We are inclined to increase duration of bond portfolios.
Asia credit spreads have partially, but not fully, recouped the losses from early August. Spreads on the Bloomberg Asia USD Investment Grade index widened by 14 bp to 98 bp between 1st August and 5th August and spreads on the Bloomberg Asia USD High Yield index widened by 61 bp to 551 bp over the same period. Since then, much of the spread widening in Asia IG was recouped, with the Bloomberg Asia USD IG spread currently at 89 bp compared with 84 bp on 1 Aug. However, spreads on Asia HY widened further, with the Bloomberg Asia USD HY spread currently at 566 bp compared with 490 bp on 1st August. The spread widening in Asia HY was concentrated amongst China names. Furthermore, over half of the issuers are China property developers. The weakness can be attributed to the strong 11.6% return year to date in China HY and lingering concerns on the China real estate sector. With no clear signs that the China property sector is stabilizing and elevated volatility across China HY, we are inclined to maintain up in quality positioning within China property credit.
Source: Bloomberg Finance L.P.
The Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA) has proposed phasing out Additional Tier 1 (AT1) such that regulatory capital requirements will be met with common equity and Tier 2. While Australian banks are fundamentally well-capitalized, the proposal is negative for Australian bank Tier 2, given possible rating downgrades and spreads widening to reflect Tier 2 becoming the only class above common equity to absorb losses, and that Australian banks would likely increase Tier 2 issuance as and when the rules are finalized. Existing AT1 instruments would be eligible to be included as Tier 2, until their first scheduled call date. All existing AT1s would reach their first call date by 2032 at the latest and APRA stated to not expect approval on regulatory calls at an earlier date than the first call date. Going forward, anticipated increase in Tier 2 supply and cessation of AT1 issuance should drive relative outperformance of AT1. We are inclined to switch positioning from Australian bank Tier 2 to AT1.
Mr. William Chow brings over two decades of asset management experience and currently oversees Raffles Family Office’s (RFO’s) Advanced Wealth Solutions division while also serving on its Board of Management and Investment Committee.
He joined RFO from China Life Franklin Asset Management (CLFAM), where as Deputy CEO from 2018 to 2021 he oversaw $35 billion in client investments. William also chaired the firm’s Risk Management Committee and was a key member of its Board of Management, Investment Committee and Alternative Investment Committee. Prior to CLFAM, he spent 7 years at Value Partners Group, the first hedge fund to be listed on the Hong Kong Stock Exchange, where he was a Group Managing Director. He started his career at UBS as an equities trader and went on to take up portfolio management roles at BlackRock and State Street Global Advisors from 2000 to 2010.
William holds a Master’s degree in Science in Operational Research from the London School of Economics and Political Science, and a Bachelor’s degree in Engineering (Hons) in Civil Engineering from University College London in the UK.
Mr. Derek Loh is the Head of Equities at Raffles Family Office. Derek has numerous years of work experience from top asset management firms and Banks – 16 Years on the Buy-side across 3 Major Cities in Hong Kong, Singapore and Tokyo. Derek demonstrates in-depth industrial knowledge and analysis, covering mostly listed equities.
As an Ex-Portfolio Manager for ACA Capital Group, Derek managed a multi-billion-dollar global fund for a world-renowned sovereign wealth fund and reputable institutional investors. Previous notable investors serviced include Norges Bank (Norwegian Central Bank), Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation and Mubadala. Derek holds an Executive MBA from Kellogg School of Management and HKUST. He is also a CPA.
Mr. Tay Ek Pon is responsible for fixed income investment management at Raffles Family Office. He has over 20 years of fixed income experience across Singapore and Japan.
Prior to joining Raffles Family Office, Ek Pon was a portfolio manager at BNP Paribas Asset Management since 2018, responsible for Asia fixed income mandates. From 2016 to 2018, Ek Pon led the team investing in Asian credit at Income Insurance. From 2011 to 2016, he worked at BlackRock, managing benchmarked and absolute return fixed income funds. Earlier in his career, he held several positions as a credit trader in banks for 9 years.
Ek Pon graduated from the University of Melbourne with a Bachelor of Commerce and Bachelor of Arts.
Mr. Sky Kwah has over a decade of work experience in the investment industry with his last stint at DBS Private Bank. He has achieved and receive multiple awards over the years being among the top investment advisors within the bank. He often deploys a top-down investment approach, well versed in multiple markets and offering bespoke advice in multiple assets and derivatives.
Prior to his role at Raffles Family Office, Sky worked at Phillip Capital as an Equities Team leader handling two teams offering advisory, spearheading portfolio reviews and developing trading/investment ideas.
He has been interviewed on Channel News Asia, 938Live radio, The Straits Times and LianheZaobao as a market commentator and was a regular speaker at investment forums and tertiary institutions.
Licenced by SFC Type 1, 4 & 9 & MAS Capital Market Services
Please note that use of the www.rafflesgroup.co website (“website”) requires full acceptance without reservation on your part of the terms & conditions outlined below.
IT IS UNDERSTOOD THAT BY CLICKING ON ‘ACCEPT’, YOU EXPRESSLY ACKNOWLEDGE AND AGREE THAT YOU HAVE FULLY READ, UNDERSTOOD AND ACCEPT ALL APPLICABLE TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF USE AND ALL LEGAL AND REGULATORY RESTRICTIONS THAT MAY AFFECT YOUR ELIGIBILITY TO ACCESS THIS SITE.